For this assignment I have been tasked to answer some questions posed by my instructor. I will post a summary of those questions along with my responses in italics.
Ebook-only publications often do not receive many reviews, unless that book is published by a well-known author. How does this affect collection development?
Naturally, this bias towards well-known authors can push collection development towards an overrepresentation of popular authors and an underrepresentation of lesser-known authors, who may be a member of a minority group. It is difficult to become a published author, and there are certain groups of individuals who simply may not have the connections and resources to publish their books through traditional means. When libraries embrace ebook-only releases, they are narrowing the privilege gap in the publishing industry.
Based upon the provided reviews for an ebook-only romance novel, would you buy this book for your library? Why or why not? Are the reviews reliable?
First, I would like to emphasize the silliness of the romance genre. Many of the review pointed out the outlandishness of the plot (a sexy billionaire who is the CEO of Winter Inc. but, for some mysterious reason, does not like Christmas himself); however, most romance novels have outlandish plots, so I do not view this as a particularly cutting critique of this romance book in question.
The people who reviewed this book are fans of the romance genre, I suspect, and based upon the amount of spelling and grammar errors in some of the reviews, these reviews seem to be from average (i.e. non-scholarly) readers - a typical library patron. I would consider this a reliable source. Public libraries directly serve non-scholarly individuals, and it is important to consider the perspectives of people who do not have advanced degrees or any degree, for that matter.
I cannot emphasize this enough: The opinions of non-professional readers are just as important as professional readers.
Now, would I personally add this book to my library's collection? Sure, I would. While the reviews are not glowing, they are still positive overall. This book seems to provide a cozy and clean Christmas read, and this is something that many library patrons like.
After reading some reviews about the popular memoir, Angela's Ashes, how do you feel about adding this book to your collection?
Each review is good, glowing even. Why wouldn't I add this book to my library? While this book does not particularly interest me, as I am not a fan of memoirs, I see the historical and cultural value of this book, and it appears that this book has emotionally moved many of its readers. If I did not add this book to my library, I would be robbing my patrons of a potentially powerful, if not life-changing, read.
Is it fair that some books are reviewed to death while other books receive almost no reviews? How does this affect a library's collection? How do you feel about review sources that refuse to print negative content? Is that appropriate? If you buy books for your library, how often do you use reviews to make your decisions? If not, do you use reviews for personal reading? What are your favorite review sources?
To answer the first two questions, it is absolutely not fair that some books receive extensive coverage while other books do not receive any coverage. By promoting some voices more than others, this can cause people and institutions (including libraries) to overvalue certain books and authors more than others. While it is important to purchase a new Stephen King book, for example, as anything he publishes would be in high-demand, what about underground authors? What if a young Native American woman has been trying to publish her poetry, but she keeps encountering racism and other roadblocks towards publishing an in-print book from a major publisher? It would be important for librarians, who have purchasing power, to ensure that they build a collection that is diverse, and as a result, librarians must read reviews from casual readers and additionally seek out books with few reviews.
In terms of publications that do not publish negative reviews, I personally find this to be concerning. Essentially, this is a form of censorship. What if a book has an overtly sexist or racist tone? What if the book's plot is, quite simply, sloppy? These are important things that must be discussed by casual and professional readers.
While I do not purchase books for my library, I still read reviews to inform my own personal reading choices, including ones for this class. Generally speaking, and perhaps embarrassingly, I most often refer to Goodreads. This is usually my first choice for reviews, since there are both non-professional and professional reviewers on Goodreads. However, ratings on Goodreads can be manipulated. I have read many underground poetry books throughout my career as a semi-professional reader, and for one book in particular that was written by a college professor, I noticed an alarming amount of five-star reviews without, well, a review. Did the professor use his influence to push his students towards giving his book five-star ratings?
A confession: I actually never read professional reviews. My secondary review source is usually Amazon or library colleagues who recommend books as they read them. Perhaps as I grow as a librarian, and especially when I begin to have purchasing power, I will broaden my book review pool and begin to include professional review sources into my book-purchasing decisions.